NET CAPITAL FLOWS TO AND THE REAL EXCHANGE RATE OF WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Hubert Gabrisch
Abstract
This paper uses Granger causality tests to assess the linkages between changes in the real exchange rate and net capital inflows using the example of Western Balkan countries, which have suffered from low competitiveness and external imbalances for many years. The real exchange rate is a measure of a country’s price competitiveness, and the paper uses two concepts: relative unit labour cost and relative inflation differential. The sample consists of six Western Balkan countries for the period 1996–2012, relative to the European Union (EU). The main finding is that changes in the net capital flows precede changes in relative unit labour costs and not vice versa. Also, there is evidence that net capital flows affect the inflation differential of countries, although to a less discernible extent. This suggests that the increasing divergence in the unit labour cost between the EU and Western Balkan countries up to the global financial crisis was at least partly the result of net capital inflows. The paper adds to the ongoing debate on improving cost competitiveness through wage restrictions as the main vehicle to avert the accumulation of current account imbalances. It shows the importance of changes in the exchange rate regime, reform of the interaction between the financial and the real sector, and financial supervision and structural change.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
Capital flows, real exchange rate, Granger causality, Western Balkan countries
JEL Classification
F41, F62
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Gabrisch, H. (2015). NET CAPITAL FLOWS TO AND THE REAL EXCHANGE RATE OF WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES. Economic Annals, 60(205), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1505031G
How to Cite
Gabrisch, H. (2015). NET CAPITAL FLOWS TO AND THE REAL EXCHANGE RATE OF WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES. Economic Annals, 60(205), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1505031G