REAL OPTIONS METHODOLOGY IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS VALUATION

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Biljana Rakic
Tamara Radenovic

Abstract

PPP offers numerous benefits to both public and private partners in delivery of infrastructure projects. However this partnership also involves great risks which have to be adequately managed and mitigated. Private partners are especially sensitive to revenue risk, since they are mostly interested in the financial viability of the project. Thus they often expect public partners to provide some kind of risk-sharing mechanism in the form of Minimum Revenue Guarantees or abandonment options. The objective of this paper is to investigate whether the real option of abandoning the project increases its value. Therefore the binominal option pricing model and risk-neutral probability approach have been implemented to price the European and American abandonment options for the Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) toll road investment. The obtained results suggest that the project value with the American abandonment option is greater than with the European abandonment option, hence implying that American options offer greater flexibility and are more valuable for private partners.
Abstract 4 | Full text (PDF) Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

public-private partnership projects, real options, abandonment option

JEL Classification

G31, H44, H54

Section
Articles

How to Cite

Rakic, B., & Radenovic, T. (2014). REAL OPTIONS METHODOLOGY IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS VALUATION. Economic Annals, 59(200), 91 – 114. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1400091R

How to Cite

Rakic, B., & Radenovic, T. (2014). REAL OPTIONS METHODOLOGY IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS VALUATION. Economic Annals, 59(200), 91 – 114. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1400091R